Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Original research
  • Open access
  • Published:

Comparison of microbiota and allergen profile in house dust from homes of allergic and non-allergic subjects- results from the GUSTO study

World Allergy Organization Journal volume 11, Article number: 37 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of allergic diseases, such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema and food allergy, has been increasing worldwide, as shown in a large number of studies, including the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC). However, there is significant variation in the prevalence of these diseases in different regions, suggesting that there may be location-specific factors such as environment and microbial exposure affecting allergic disease prevalence. Hence, in this study we determine if there is a difference in microbiota composition and allergen concentration of household dust collected from the homes of non-allergic and allergic subjects from the Growing Up in Singapore Towards Healthy Outcomes (GUSTO) cohort.

Methods

From the Growing Up in Singapore Towards Healthy Outcomes (GUSTO) cohort, 25 allergic subjects and 25 non-allergic subjects were selected at the year 5.5 follow up. Definitions of allergic outcomes were standardized in the questionnaires administered at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months to ensure consistency during interviews and home visits. Allergen sensitization was determined by skin prick testing (SPT) at 18, 36 and 60 months. Dust samples were collected from the subject’s bed, sofa, and play area. DNA extraction was carried out and V3-V4 hypervariable regions of bacterial 16S rRNA gene were sequenced. Protein extraction was performed and allergens assayed by using multiplex assay and ELISA.

Results

The most abundant phyla in house dust were Actinobacteria (29.8%), Firmicutes (27.7%), and Proteobacteria (22.4%). Although there were no differences in bacteria abundance and diversity between house dust samples of allergic and non-allergic subjects, the relative abundance of Anaplasmataceae, Bacteroidaceae, and Leptospiraceae were significantly higher in dust samples of allergic subjects as compared to non-allergic subjects in 2 or more locations. The concentration of Der p 1 was significantly lower in bed dust samples of allergic subjects (Median [Interquartile range], 174 ng/g [115–299 ng/g]) as compared to non-allergic subjects (309 ng/g [201–400 ng/g]; P < 0.05). The concentration of tropomyosin was significantly higher in sofa dust samples of allergic subjects (175 ng/g [145–284 ng/g] as compared to non-allergic subjects (116 ng/g [52.8–170 ng/g]; P < 0.05).

Conclusion

In conclusion, we found a differential microbiota and allergen profile between homes of allergic and non-allergic subjects.

Trial registration

NCT01174875 Registered 1 July 2010, retrospectively registered.

Background

The prevalence of allergic diseases such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema and food allergy has been increasing worldwide, as shown in a large number of studies, including the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) [1]. However, there is significant variation in the prevalence of these diseases in different regions, suggesting that there may be location-specific factors such as environment and microbial exposure affecting allergic disease prevalence [2]. The difference in rates of allergic diseases between genetically similar populations in different parts of the world further emphasizes the differences in environmental risk factors that may play an influential role in the development of allergy [3]. However, most of the literature in the field focused on gut microbiota, with limited information on environmental microbiota and its influence on disease development [4,5,6,7,8,9].

The hygiene hypothesis states that cleaner environments result in a decrease in “natural” Th1/ Treg-trophic microbial signals resulting in a shift to a pro-inflammatory Th2 environment [10]. It is thought that a lack of exposure to microbial or infectious agents increases the susceptibility to atopic diseases such as atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis and/ or allergic asthma by suppressing the natural development of the immune system [11]. However, recent literature in the field has been conflicting. While there are various studies in different populations demonstrating an inverse relationship between microbial exposure and development of allergic symptoms such as atopy and asthma [12,13,14], others showed a positive correlation between microbial exposure and allergy [15,16,17,18]. A study conducted in Germany that analyzed the mattress dust from 489 children showed that increased exposure to a rich microbial environment protects against atopy and asthma in children aged between 6 and 13 years old living in rural and sub-urban environments [12] while another study conducted in USA that recruited children from 308 homes showed an increase in bacterial diversity/abundance in the homes of asthmatic patients, aged 2.4 ± 0.9 years (mean ± SD) [19].

To our knowledge, most of these studies that specifically investigated the bacterial composition of house dust have dust sampling carried out at a single site, mainly from the bed [12, 20, 21]. In addition, the studies are mostly conducted in the Western countries [12, 14, 19, 22,23,24,25] where lifestyle and environmental factors differ from Asian countries. Hence in this study, we determined if there is a difference in microbiota composition, and allergen concentration of household dust collected from 3 different sites in the houses of 25 non-allergic and 25 allergic subjects from the Growing Up in Singapore towards Healthy Outcomes (GUSTO) birth cohort at the 5.5 year follow up.

Methods

Study design and subjects

From the Growing Up in Singapore Towards Healthy Outcomes (GUSTO) cohort, we conducted a pilot study with random sampling of houses of 25 allergic subjects and 25 non-allergic subjects at the year 5.5 follow up. The methodology of the GUSTO study has been described previously [26]. Briefly, we recruited healthy pregnant mothers who agreed to enroll their offspring for future follow-up. Interviewers gathered information on demographic characteristics, family history of allergy, social data and lifestyle factors. Definitions of allergic outcomes were standardized in the questionnaires administered at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months to ensure consistency during interviews and home visits. We used the ISAAC modified questionnaire as used in other studies [27]. Physician-diagnosed atopic eczema was based on a positive answer to the written question: “Has your child ever been diagnosed with eczema?”, “Wheezing” was based on positive answers to “Has your child ever wheezed?” and “Has your child ever been prescribed with nebulizer/inhaler?”, while “rhinitis” was based on a positive response to the question “Has your child ever had sneezing, running nose, blocked or congested nose, snoring or noisy breathing during sleep or when awake that has lasted for 2 or more weeks duration?”. Allergen sensitization was determined by skin prick testing (SPT) to house dust mite allergens (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae, and Blomia tropicalis) and food allergens (egg, peanut and cow’s milk) at 18, 36 and 60 months. At 60 months, skin prick testing was also carried out to shrimp and crab allergens. The allergens for skin prick testing were obtained from Greer Laboratories (Lenoir, NC, USA), except for B. tropicalis, which was obtained from our laboratory. Tests were interpreted as positive if the wheal was at least 3 mm, and a child was considered as SPT-positive if any one or more of the individual tests was positive with a positive reaction to the positive control (histamine) and a negative reaction to the negative control (saline). Allergic subjects have a positive SPT to at least one of the tested allergens at year 5 and have ever given positive replies to questions on allergic outcomes. Non-allergic subjects have no positive SPT and answered “no” to all questions on allergy in the first 5 years of life. Ethics approval was obtained from the Domain Specific Review Board of Singapore National Healthcare Group and the Centralised Institutional Review Board of SingHealth. Conduct of this study was based on the guidelines in the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Sample collection and processing

Dust samples were collected from a random sampling of houses of 25 allergic subjects, and 25 non-allergic subjects at year 5.5. Singapore is an urban city and the samples were collected from the subject’s bed, sofa, and 2 m by 1 m play area, using vacuum cleaners (Dyson DC63; Dyson, UK) with 40 μm nylon mesh DUSTREAM® filters (Indoor Biotechnologies, India). Each area was vacuumed for 4 min. Debris were manually removed from the dust samples and all samples were then stored at − 80 °C until further processing.

For DNA analyses, the samples were processed using PowerFood® Microbial DNA Isolation Kit (Mobio Laboratories, Inc., USA), with slight modification in cell lysis procedure as compared to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, the samples were resuspended in 450 μl Solution PF1 and disrupted in MicroBead Tube using FastPrep-24 instrument (MP Biomedicals, USA) for 20 s at 4 m/s twice. Total DNA was extracted and stored at − 30 °C until sequencing of bacteria 16S rRNA.

For proteomic analyses, the samples were extracted in Tris-buffered-saline, containing 0.05% Tween-20 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and Halt Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) at a ratio of 1 mg to 50 μl. The samples were rotated at 4 °C for 2 h, and the supernatants were stored at − 80 °C until measurement of various indoor allergens.

Bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing

Bacterial V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene were sequenced according to the Illumina 16S metagenomics sequencing library preparation protocol with some modifications. Briefly, bacterial V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene were amplified using the bacteria primer 340F (5’-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′) and reverse primer 805R (5′- GACTACNVGGGTATCTAATCC -3′), flanked with Illumina overhang adapters [28, 29]. PCR amplifications were performed in a final volume of 25 μl, containing 1.25 μl of 10 μM each primer, 1 μl of template DNA and 12.5 μl of Q5® Hot Start High-Fidelity 2× Master Mix (New England Biolabs, USA). The PCR conditions were as follows: 98 °C for 30 s; 30 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 71.6 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30s; followed by 72 °C for 10 mins. A subsequent limited-cycle amplification step was performed to attach multiplexing indices and Illumina adapter sequences to the amplicons. Amplicons from each sample was subsequently quantified by qPCR using the KAPA library quantification kit (KAPA Biosystems, USA) and pooled in equimolar concentrations into a single library. The pooled libraries were loaded into MiSeq instrument (Illumina, USA) for cluster generation and sequencing according to specifications to generate paired-end reads of 250 bp each. The sequencing data were matched with Greengenes database using Illumina BaseSpace 16S Metagenomics Application.

Measurement of indoor allergens

Concentration of Blo t 5 was measured using sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as previously described [30], with slight modification. Briefly, microtiter plate was coated overnight at 4 °C with 2 μg/ml of mouse anti-Blo t 5 monoclonal antibody in 0.1 M sodium bicarbonate buffer, pH 8.3. After blocking, 50 μl of dust sample was added to the wells and incubated at 4 °C overnight. Guinea pig anti-Blo t 5 serum (1:2000), and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-guinea pig IgG (1:10,000; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were used as secondary antibodies and detection antibodies respectively. Signal was developed by addition of TMB substrate (eBioscience, Inc., USA).

Concentrations of Der p 1, Der f 1, mite group 2, Fel d 1 and Can f 1 were measured using Multiplex Array for Indoor Allergens (MARIA™; Indoor Biotechnologies, UK), as per manufacturer’s instructions. Concentration of tropomyosin was measured using Tropomoysin ELISA kit (Indoor Biotechnologies, UK), as per manufacturer’s instructions. Results were reported as nanogram of allergen per gram of dust sample. The lower limits of detection were for 3.05 ng/g for Der p 1, Der f 1, and Can f 1; 1.22 ng/g for mite group 2 and Fel d 1; 1.95 ng/g for Blo t 5; 5 ng/g for Tropomoysin.

Statistical analysis

For DNA analysis, data were analyzed using CRAN software with ggplot2 package for analysis of phyla composition, and vegan package for comparison of relative abundance of bacterial families. Difference in relative abundance of bacterial families with IndVal value > 0.6 and P-value < 0.05 were considered significant. Data were also analyzed using QIIME version 1.9.1 for alpha diversity, and plotted using GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., USA). To compare the bacterial diversity of house dust samples of allergic subjects and non-allergic subjects, Shannon and Simpson’s alpha diversity indices of the samples were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Differences with P-value < 0.05 were considered significant.

For proteomic analysis, data were plotted and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5 software. The data were compared using Mann–Whitney U test. Differences with P-value < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Study population

There were differences in gender and maternal education levels between the groups. There were significantly more boys and mothers with a higher education level in the allergic group (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison of demographic variables and cleaning frequency between the groups
Full size table

There were no significant differences in ethnicity, mode of delivery, family history of allergy and pet ownership between the groups (Table 1). The subjects from the allergic group cleaned the sofa and changed the bedsheet more regularly than those from the non-allergic group although it did not reach statistical significance (Table 1).

Bacterial communities

16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed on 146 dust samples only as 3 subjects did not have a sofa during the time of collection and 1 play area dust sample did not yield any visible PCR product on agarose gel electrophoresis. Sequencing of remaining 146 dust samples yielded on average of 212,741 V3-V4 raw sequence reads, with 88.2% of the sequence reads classified to the genus level. To assess if the sequencing depth was sufficient to cover the diversity of the samples, rarefaction curves were plotted showing the number of reads in each sample against the number of observed OTUs or Shannon diversity indices. Analysis of the rarefaction curves showed that the sequencing depth was sufficient (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The sequence reads were classified into 29 phyla, 63 classes, 123 orders, 276 families, and 860 genera, and only 11.8% of the sequences were not classified at the genus level. The most abundant phyla were Actinobacteria (29.8%), Firmicutes (27.7%), and Proteobacteria (22.4%, Fig. 1). The most abundant families were Corynebacteriaceae (9.4%), Veillonellaceae (9.3%), and Staphylococcaceae (7.6%). There was no significant difference in Shannon or Simpson’s diversity indices of bed dust samples of the allergic subjects and non-allergic subjects. Similar results were observed for the play area and sofa dust samples (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The overall phyla composition of individual dust samples from the bed, play area, and sofa of allergic and non-allergic subjects. The individual dust samples were grouped based on their location, followed by allergic status on the X-axis, and relative abundance on the Y-axis. The bacteria phyla with average relative abundance of > 7% across all samples or > 10% in at least 1 sample were represented. The dust samples contained primarily of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Planctomycetes

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Bacterial diversity among dust samples from the bed (○), play area (□), and sofa (∆) of allergic (open) and non-allergic (close) subjects. Bacterial diversities were represented by Shannon Index (a) and Simpsons Index (b). Red line represents the median of each group. There were no difference in bacterial diversity between bed dust samples of allergic subjects and non-allergic subjects using Mann-Whitney U test. Similar trend was observed for play area and sofa samples

Full size image

To examine the role of bacterial composition of house dust samples in allergic sensitization, principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities was performed. PCoA displayed no distinct clustering effects of house dust samples of allergic subjects and non-allergic subjects (Additional file 1: Figure S2a). Similar results were observed for bed dust samples, play area dust samples, or sofa dust samples of allergic subjects and non-allergic subjects (Additional file 1: Figure S2b). These results indicate that the relative abundance of major bacterial taxonomic groups was similar between the house dust samples of allergic and non-allergic subjects.

To identify specific bacterial families in house dust samples that correlate with the allergic status of the subject, differences in relative abundance of bacterial families in house dust samples of allergic and non-allergic subjects were compared using relative indicator value analysis (IndVal). Bacterial families that were significantly different in the house dust samples of allergic and non-allergic subjects were identified, and their relative abundance were represented using heat-map (Fig. 3a, b, and c). Interestingly, relative abundance of Anaplasmataceae, Bacteroidaceae, and Leptospiraceae were significantly higher in dust samples of allergic subjects as compared to non-allergic subjects in 2 or more dust sampling locations.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Relative abundance of bacterial families that were significantly different in the house dust samples of allergic subjects as compared to non-allergic subjects. Relative abundance of bacterial families in house dust samples from the bed (a), play area (b), and sofa (c) of allergic and non-allergic subjects were transformed into Z-score and represented using heat maps. Raw relative abundance of Anaplasmataceae (d), Bacteroidaceae (e), and Leptospiraceae (f) in the house dust samples from the bed (○), play area (□), and sofa (∆) of allergic (open) and non-allergic (close) subjects were represented using dot plot. Red line represents the mean of each group. Red line represents the mean of each group. Asterisk (*) represents significant difference of IndVal value > 0.6 and P-value < 0.05

Full size image

Relative abundance of Anaplasmataceae was significantly higher in the bed dust samples of allergic subjects (Mean ± SEM, 0.00900 ± 0.00326) as compared to the non-allergic subjects (0.00354 ± 0.000838; Fig. 3d). Relative abundance of Anaplasmataceae was also significantly higher in the play area dust samples of allergic subjects (0.0135 ± 0.00645) as compared to the non-allergic subjects (0.00277 ± 0.000756). There was a trend of higher relative abundance of Anaplasmataceae in the sofa dust samples of allergic subjects (0.00402 ± 0.00101) as compared to the non-allergic subjects (0.00338 ± 0.000596), albeit without statistical significance.

In all 3 locations, the relative abundance of Bacteroidaceae was significantly higher in the house dust samples of allergic subjects (bed 0.0444 ± 0.0157; play area 0.0529 ± 0.0255; sofa 0.280 ± 0.183) as compared to the non-allergic subjects (bed 0.0120 ± 0.00418; play area 0.00503 ± 0.00194, sofa: 0.0183 ± 0.00858; Fig. 3e). Relative abundance of Leptospiraceae was significantly higher in the play area and sofa dust samples of allergic subjects (play area 0.002403 ± 0.000877; sofa 0.00518 ± 0.00328), as compared to the non-allergic subjects (play area 0.000652 ± 0.000348; sofa 0.000194 ± 0.00008; Fig. 3f). There was a trend of higher relative abundance of Leptospiraceae in the bed dust samples of allergic subjects (0.000993 ± 0.000261) as compared to the non-allergic subjects (0.000636 ± 0.000218), albeit without statistical significance.

Indoor allergens

To investigate the role of indoor allergens in allergic sensitization, allergens were extracted from house dust samples of allergic and non-allergic subjects and measured using ELISA or MARIA assays. A total of 147 house dust samples were measured for Der f 1, Der p 1, mite group 2, tropomyosin, Can f 1, and Fel d 1 as 3 subjects did not have a sofa during the time of collection. Only 138 and 116 house samples were measured for Blo t 5 and tropomyosin respectively, as remaining samples collected were insufficient for the assays. The prevalence of mite group 2 (99.3%), tropomyosin (99.1%), Der p 1 (98.6%), and Blo t 5 (96.4%) were higher than Fel d 1 (59.2%), Der f 1 (53.1%), and Can f 1 (36.7%). The dust samples contained on average 66.9 ng/g of Der f 1, 218 ng/g of Der p 1, 178 ng/g of Blo t 5, 2676 ng/g of mite group 2, 287 ng/g of tropomyosin, 18.5 ng/g of Can f 1, and 6.4 ng/g of Fel d 1.

The concentration of Der p 1 was significantly lower in bed dust samples of allergic subjects (Median [Interquartile range], 174 ng/g [115–299 ng/g]) as compared to non-allergic subjects (309 ng/g [201–400 ng/g]; P < 0.05; Fig. 4a). The concentration of Der p 1 was also lower in sofa dust samples of allergic subjects (143 ng/g [84.1–292 ng/g]) as compared to non-allergic subjects (271 ng/g [122–482 ng/g]), albeit with borderline significance (P = 0.0626). There was no difference in Der p 1 concentration in play area dust samples between allergic subjects and non-allergic subjects.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Concentration of indoor allergens, (a) Der p 1 (b) Tropomyosin (c) Mite Group 2 (d) Blo t 5 (e) Der f 1 (f) Can f 1(g) Fel d 1 of dust samples from the bed (○), play Area (□), and sofa (∆) of allergic (open) and non-allergic (close) subjects. Red line represents the median of each group. Dotted lines represent the lower limit of detection of each allergen. Asterisk (*) represents significant difference of P-value < 0.05

Full size image

Interestingly, the concentration of tropomyosin was significantly higher in sofa dust samples of allergic subjects (175 ng/g [145–284 ng/g]) as compared to non-allergic subjects (116 ng/g [52.8–170 ng/g]; P < 0.05; Fig. 4b). Twenty (83.3%) allergic subjects eat on the sofa compared to 16 (69.6%) of non-allergic subjects (p = 0.3, data not shown) There was no difference in the concentration of tropomyosin in bed or play area dust samples between allergic and non-allergic subjects. There was no difference in the concentration of other allergens in house dust samples between allergic subjects and non-allergic subjects. We did not observe any correlation between microbiota and allergen levels (data not shown).

Since tropomyosin can be derived from crustacean sources, such as shrimp, crab, and lobster, or non-crustacean sources, such as dust mites (Blo t, Der f, and Der p), the relationship between concentration of tropomyosin, and concentration of Blo t 5, Der f 1, or Der p 1 in sofa dust samples were examined using Spearman rank-order correlation analysis. The analysis shows that there was no significant correlation between concentration of tropomyosin and concentration of Blo t 5, Der f 1, or Der p 1 in sofa dust samples of allergic subjects (Additional file 1: Figure S3a, b, and c). Similar results were observed for sofa dust samples of non-allergic subjects (Additional file 1: Figure S3d, e, and f). Therefore higher concentration of tropomyosin observed in sofa dust samples of allergic subjects as compared to non-allergic subjects was unlikely to be due to house dust mites.

Discussion

In this study we found that the most abundant phyla in house dust were Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria which has also been reported by a European study that included 102 children from 6 to 12 years of age staying in rural areas [31]. In addition, the presence of these bacteria has also been reported on skin microbiota, suggesting a link between environmental and skin microbiota [32]. We also observed increased abundance of the bacteria families, Bacteroidaceae, Anaplasmataceae and Leptospiraceae across all 3 sites from houses of allergic subjects although there is no difference in bacteria diversity or major bacterial taxonomic groups (relative abundance of > 1%) between houses of allergic and non-allergic subjects. In agreement with our observations, a study by Ciacco et al. also reported that genus richness did not differ in the houses of asthmatics and non-asthmatics. Instead, different bacteria were in found in higher abundance in the houses of asthmatic patients [19].

Interestingly, all three of these bacterial families are gram-negative. Another study analyzing dust samples from Russian and Finnish Karelian also reported a higher proportion of Gram-negative bacteria in Finnish households, where the risk of atopy in childhood was nearly fourfold higher [25]. Similarly, another birth cohort study in New York City measured the endotoxin levels in dust samples taken from the houses of 12 or 36 month old children of African-American or Dominican descent and they found a positive association between higher endotoxin levels with wheeze at 2 years [33]. Endotoxins are polysaccharides found on the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, and are usually used to assess gram-negative bacterial load. Another study in Boston also reported that endotoxin exposure could independently cause elevated risk of wheeze and recurrent wheeze in 1 year old children, with a family history of asthma or allergy [34].

On the contrary, a study in Germany found that higher level of endotoxin in the mattress dust was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of atopic diseases such as hay fever, atopic sensitization, atopic asthma, and atopic wheeze in children. [35]. Likewise, another study done in Germany also reported an inverse relationship between endotoxin levels and atopic dermatitis in children aged 2–4 years [36]. However, not all gram-negative bacteria are lipopolysaccharide- (LPS) positive. A study by Borjesson et al. showed that some members of the Anaplasmataceae family are LPS-negative and these LPS-negative gram-negative bacteria were shown to elicit different proinflammatory responses as compared to the LPS-positive gram-negative bacteria while another study also showed that N.helminthoeca, another member of the Anaplasmataceae family, has no ability to synthesise LPS. [37, 38] . Furthermore, a study by Patra et al also demonstrated that the structure of LPS differs between pathogenic and intermediately pathogenic species of Leptospiraceae [39]. These studies suggest that the production and structure of endotoxin differ between different species of gram-negative bacteria.

Interestingly, a study in a Japanese population found that Bacteroidaceae was found at higher levels in gut microbiota of allergic subjects at ages 1 and 2 months, as compared to the non-allergic subjects [40]. This suggests a possible link between environmental microbiota and gut microbiota. Another study also found that the presence of Bacteroides was associated with the extent of atopic sensitization before weaning [41]. Infants with atopic eczema had significantly higher proportion of Bacteroides prior to weaning. Typically, Bacteroides tend to increase in population in the infant’s gut after weaning. However, Lynch et al found that members of the Bacteroidetes phyla, were significantly increased in the first-year dust samples of the non-allergic group, suggesting possible protective effects [14].

As shellfish allergy is most prevalent at this age group of 5 years in Singapore [42, 43], we measured tropomyosin, the major allergen in shellfish, in this study and, we found that the concentration of tropomyosin was elevated in the sofa dust samples of allergic subjects as compared to non-allergic subjects. In addition, within the allergic group, concentration of tropomyosin is also higher in houses of subjects sensitized to shellfish allergens compared to the nonsensitized subjects. One possible reason for this increased tropomyosin concentration could be due to the presence of crustacean (shrimp, crab, lobster) allergens in homes, which could lead to sensitization via cutaneous contact. A study by Fox et al also shows that environmental exposure to higher levels of peanut allergen increases the risk of developing peanut allergy [44]. Dust samples with high levels of peanut allergens have also been found to be biologically active and can activate basophils in a dose dependent manner in children with peanut allergy [45]. Besides shellfish allergens, another possible source of tropomyosin may also be from cockroach allergens. We noticed lower concentrations of Der p 1 on the bed and sofa dust samples collected from the houses of allergic subjects compared to the non-allergic subjects and this can possibly be due to the higher frequency of cleaning of sofa as well as changing of bedsheets by the allergic subjects, although this did not reach statistical significance. Similarly, the comparable levels of Der p 1 from the dust collected in the play areas could be due to a similar cleaning frequency of the houses by the allergic and non-allergic subjects.

One of the strengths of this study is that the GUSTO study is the first in Asia to study the relation of both microbial and allergens exposure on allergic outcomes. To the best of our knowledge, there is only one other study in the United States that studied the effect of a combination of bacterial/allergen exposure to atopy [14]. In addition, we used an objective assessment of environmental allergen levels by assaying it from dust instead of a questionnaire-based approach. Besides that, instead of measuring endotoxin levels as an indirect assessment of bacterial levels, we employed 16S rRNA sequencing techniques to identify specific bacteria communities. Seasonal variation is likely to affect microbiota and allergen concentration, however in Singapore, a tropical climate with constant UVB radiation is present year-round due to our geographical location on the equator. However, as this is a cross-sectional study, we are unable to determine causality and if house dust composition is affected by allergic status. Besides that, we did not collect information on number of occupants in the house which may potentially also affect microbiota and allergen levels. In addition, mode of delivery is known to affect allergic outcomes, however we did not observe differences in mode of delivery between the allergic and non-allergic subjects in our study, this is likely due to our small sample size. Another limitation is the low amounts of dust samples collected which did not allow us to analyse the levels of more food allergens such as peanut allergens.

In conclusion, we found a differential microbiota and allergen profile between houses of allergic and non-allergic subjects.

Abbreviations

GUSTO:

Growing Up in Singapore Towards Healthy Outcomes

ISAAC:

International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

SPT:

Skin prick testing

References

  1. Asher MI, Montefort S, Björkstén B, Lai CK, Strachan DP, Weiland SK, Williams H, I. P. T. S. Group. Worldwide time trends in the prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema in childhood: ISAAC phases one and three repeat multicountry cross-sectional surveys. Lancet. 2006;368:733–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Björkstén B. Effects of intestinal microflora and the environment on the development of asthma and allergy. Springer Semin Immunopathol. 2004;25(3-4):257–70.

  3. Du Toit G, Katz Y, Sasieni P, Mesher D, Maleki SJ, Fisher HR, Fox AT, Turcanu V, Amir T, Zadik-Mnuhin G. Early consumption of peanuts in infancy is associated with a low prevalence of peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122:984–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Penders J, Stobberingh EE, Brandt P v d, Thijs C. The role of the intestinal microbiota in the development of atopic disorders. Allergy. 2007;62:1223–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Penders J, Thijs C, van den Brandt PA, Kummeling I, Snijders B, Stelma F, Adams H, van Ree R, Stobberingh EE. Gut microbiota composition and development of atopic manifestations in infancy: the KOALA birth cohort study. Gut. 2006;56(5):661–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirjavainen PV, Gibson GR. Healthy gut microflora and allergy: factors influencing development of the microbiota. Ann Med. 1999;31:288–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanski I, von Hertzen L, Fyhrquist N, Koskinen K, Torppa K, Laatikainen T, Karisola P, Auvinen P, Paulin L, Mäkelä MJ. Environmental biodiversity, human microbiota, and allergy are interrelated. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109:8334–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bjorksten B, Naaber P, Sepp E, Mikelsaar M. The intestinal microflora in allergic Estonian and Swedish 2-year-old children. Clin Exp Allergy. 1999;29:342–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sjögren YM, Jenmalm MC, Böttcher MF, Björkstén B, Sverremark-Ekström E. Altered early infant gut microbiota in children developing allergy up to 5 years of age. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009;39:518–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Martino D, Prescott S. Silent mysteries: epigenetic paradigms could hold the key to conquering the epidemic of allergy and immune disease. Allergy. 2010;65:7–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bloomfield S, Stanwell-Smith R, Crevel R, Pickup J. Too clean, or not too clean: the hygiene hypothesis and home hygiene. Clin Exp Allergy. 2006;36:402–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ege M, Mayer M, Schwaiger K, Mattes J, Pershagen G, Hage M v, Scheynius A, Bauer J, Mutius E v. Environmental bacteria and childhood asthma. Allergy. 2012;67:1565–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hilty M, Burke C, Pedro H, Cardenas P, Bush A, Bossley C, Davies J, Ervine A, Poulter L, Pachter L. Disordered microbial communities in asthmatic airways. PLoS One. 2010;5:e8578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lynch SV, Wood RA, Boushey H, Bacharier LB, Bloomberg GR, Kattan M, O’Connor GT, Sandel MT, Calatroni A, Matsui E. Effects of early-life exposure to allergens and bacteria on recurrent wheeze and atopy in urban children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134:593–601. e512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Riedler J, Eder W, Oberfeld G, Schreuer M. Austrian children living on a farm have less hay fever, asthma and allergic sensitization. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30:194–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Von Ehrenstein O, Von Mutius E, Illi S, Baumann L, Bohm O, Von Kries R. Reduced risk of hay fever and asthma among children of farmers. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30:187–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hesselmar B, Aberg N, Aberg B, Eriksson B, Bjorksten B. Does early exposure to cat or dog protect against later allergy development? Clin Exp Allergy. 1999;29:611–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Flohr C, Pascoe D, Williams H. Atopic dermatitis and the ‘hygiene hypothesis’: too clean to be true? Br J Dermatol. 2005;152:202–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ciaccio CE, Barnes C, Kennedy K, Chan M, Portnoy J, Rosenwasser L. Home dust microbiota is disordered in homes of low-income asthmatic children. J Asthma. 2015;52:873–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Horak B, Dutkiewicz J, Solarz K. Microflora and acarofauna of bed dust from homes in upper Silesia, Poland. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996;76:41–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Korthals M, Ege M, Lick S, von Mutius E, Bauer J. Occurrence of Listeria spp. in mattress dust of farm children in Bavaria. Environ Res. 2008;107:299–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Täubel M, Rintala H, Pitkäranta M, Paulin L, Laitinen S, Pekkanen J, Hyvärinen A, Nevalainen A. The occupant as a source of house dust bacteria. J Allergy Clin Immunolo. 2009;124:834–840. e847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Valkonen M, Wouters IM, Täubel M, Rintala H, Lenters V, Vasara R, Genuneit J, Braun-Fahrländer C, Piarroux R, Von Mutius E. Bacterial exposures and associations with atopy and asthma in children. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0131594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hanson B, Zhou Y, Bautista EJ, Urch B, Speck M, Silverman F, Muilenberg M, Phipatanakul W, Weinstock G, Sodergren E. Characterization of the bacterial and fungal microbiome in indoor dust and outdoor air samples: a pilot study. Environ Sci Processes Impacts. 2016;18:713–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pakarinen J, Hyvärinen A, Salkinoja-Salonen M, Laitinen S, Nevalainen A, Mäkelä MJ, Haahtela T, Von Hertzen L. Predominance of gram-positive bacteria in house dust in the low-allergy risk Russian Karelia. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:3317–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Soh SE, Tint MT, Gluckman PD, Godfrey KM, Rifkin-Graboi A, Chan YH, Stunkel W, Holbrook JD, Kwek K, Chong YS, Saw SM. Cohort profile: growing up in Singapore towards healthy outcomes (GUSTO) birth cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;43(5):1401–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bunyavanich S, Rifas-Shiman SL, Platts-Mills TA, Workman L, Sordillo JE, Camargo CA Jr, Gillman MW, Gold DR, Litonjua AA. Peanut, milk, and wheat intake during pregnancy is associated with reduced allergy and asthma in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133:1373–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glockner FO. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Takahashi S, Tomita J, Nishioka K, Hisada T, Nishijima M. Development of a prokaryotic universal primer for simultaneous analysis of Bacteria and archaea using next-generation sequencing. PLoS One. 2014;9:e105592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yi FC, Lee BW, Cheong N, Chua KY. Quantification of Blo t 5 in mite and dust extracts by two-site ELISA. Allergy. 2005;60:108–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Birzele LT, Depner M, Ege MJ, Engel M, Kublik S, Bernau C, Loss GJ, Genuneit J, Horak E, Schloter M, Braun-Fahrlander C, Danielewicz H, Heederik D, von Mutius E, Legatzki A. Environmental and mucosal microbiota and their role in childhood asthma. Allergy. 2017;72:109–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Grice EA, Kong HH, Renaud G, Young AC, Program NCS, Bouffard GG, Blakesley RW, Wolfsberg TG, Turner ML, Segre JA. A diversity profile of the human skin microbiota. Genome Res. 2008;18:1043–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Perzanowski MS, Miller RL, Thorne PS, Barr RG, Divjan A, Sheares BJ, Garfinkel RS, Perera FP, Goldstein IF, Chew GL. Endotoxin in inner-city homes: associations with wheeze and eczema in early childhood. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:1082–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Park J-H, Gold DR, Spiegelman DL, Burge HA, Milton DK. House dust endotoxin and wheeze in the first year of life. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:322–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Braun-Fahrländer C, Riedler J, Herz U, Eder W, Waser M, Grize L, Maisch S, Carr D, Gerlach F, Bufe A. Environmental exposure to endotoxin and its relation to asthma in school-age children. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:869–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gehring U, Bischof W, Fahlbusch B r, Wichmann H-E, Heinrich J. House dust endotoxin and allergic sensitization in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:939–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lin M, Bachman K, Cheng Z, Daugherty SC, Nagaraj S, Sengamalay N, Ott S, Godinez A, Tallon LJ, Sadzewicz L, Fraser C, Dunning Hotopp JC, Rikihisa Y. Analysis of complete genome sequence and major surface antigens of Neorickettsia helminthoeca, causative agent of salmon poisoning disease. Microb Biotechnol. 2017;10:933–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Borjesson D, MacNamara K, Johns J, Winslow G. Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia muris induce cytopenias and global defects in hematopoiesis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15:66–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Patra KP, Choudhury B, Matthias MM, Baga S, Bandyopadhya K, Vinetz JM. Comparative analysis of lipopolysaccharides of pathogenic and intermediately pathogenic Leptospira species. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Songjinda P, Nakayama J, Tateyama A, Tanaka S, Tsubouchi M, Kiyohara C, Shirakawa T, Sonomoto K. Differences in developing intestinal microbiota between allergic and non-allergic infants: a pilot study in Japan. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007;71:2338–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kirjavainen P, Arvola T, Salminen S, Isolauri E. Aberrant composition of gut microbiota of allergic infants: a target of bifidobacterial therapy at weaning? Gut. 2002;51:51–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Shek LP-C, Cabrera-Morales EA, Soh SE, Gerez I, Ng PZ, Yi FC, Ma S, Lee BW. A population-based questionnaire survey on the prevalence of peanut, tree nut, and shellfish allergy in 2 Asian populations. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126:324–331. e327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee AJ, Shek LP-C. Food allergy in Singapore: opening a new chapter. Singap Med J. 2014;55:244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Fox AT, Sasieni P, du Toit G, Syed H, Lack G. Household peanut consumption as a risk factor for the development of peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123:417–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Brough HA, Santos AF, Makinson K, Penagos M, Stephens AC, Douiri A, Fox AT, Du Toit G, Turcanu V, Lack G. Peanut protein in household dust is related to household peanut consumption and is biologically active. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132:630–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The co-authors acknowledge the contribution of Vishuo Biomedical Pte Ltd. for helping with the 16s rRNA sequencing and Delia Pang who helped to collect the dust and the rest of the GUSTO study group which includes Lee Yung Seng, Keith M Godfrey, Wei Wei Pang, Pratibha Agarwal, Dennis Bier, Arijit Biswas, Shirong Cai, Jerry Kok Yen Chan, Cornelia Yin Ing Chee, Helen Y. H Chen, Audrey Chia, Amutha Chinnadurai, Chai Kiat Chng, Shang Chee Chong, Mei Chien Chua, Chun Ming Ding, Eric Andrew Finkelstein, Doris Fok, Marielle Fortier, Yam Thiam Daniel Goh, Joshua J. Gooley, Wee Meng Han, Mark Hanson, Christiani Jeyakumar Henry, Joanna D Holbrook, Chin-Ying Hsu, Hazel Inskip, Jeevesh Kapur, Birit Leutscher-Broekman, Sok Bee Lim, Seong Feei Loh, Yen-Ling Low, Iliana Magiati, Lourdes Mary Daniel, Michael Meaney, Susan Morton, Cheryl Ngo, Krishnamoorthy Niduvaje, Anqi Qiu, Boon Long Quah, Victor Samuel Rajadurai, Mary Rauff, Jenny L. Richmond, Anne Rifkin-Graboi, Allan Sheppard, Borys Shuter, Leher Singh, Wing Chee So, Walter Stunkel, Lin Lin Su, Soek Hui Tan, Rob M. van Dam, Sudhakar K. Venkatesh, Inez Bik Yun Wong, P. C. Wong, George Seow Heong Yeo.

Funding

This research is supported by the Singapore National Research Foundation under its Translational and Clinical Research (TCR) Flagship Programme and administered by the Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council (NMRC), Singapore- NMRC/TCR/004-NUS/2008; NMRC/TCR/012-NUHS/2014. This work is also supported by the National Medical Research Council and NMRC/CSA/022/2010. Additional funding is provided by the Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Evelyn Xiu Ling Loo and Lamony Jian Ming Chew contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences (SICS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore

    Evelyn Xiu Ling Loo, Yap Seng Chong & Lynette Pei-chi Shek

  2. Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Lamony Jian Ming Chew, Atiqa Binte Zulkifli, Le Duc Huy Ta, I-Chun Kuo, Hugo Van Bever, Bee Wah Lee & Lynette Pei-chi Shek

  3. Allergy Service, Department of Paediatrics, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

    Anne Goh

  4. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Yap Seng Chong

  5. Growth, Development and Metabolism Programme, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences (SICS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore

    Peter D. Gluckman

  6. Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Peter D. Gluckman

  7. Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children’s Medical Institute, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore

    Hugo Van Bever & Lynette Pei-chi Shek

  8. Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

    Kok Hian Tan

  9. Department of Endocrinology, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

    Fabian Yap

  10. Respiratory Medicine Service, Department of Paediatrics, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

    Oon Hoe Teoh

Authors
  1. Evelyn Xiu Ling Loo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lamony Jian Ming Chew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Atiqa Binte Zulkifli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Le Duc Huy Ta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. I-Chun Kuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anne Goh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Oon Hoe Teoh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hugo Van Bever
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Peter D. Gluckman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Fabian Yap
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Kok Hian Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Yap Seng Chong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Bee Wah Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Lynette Pei-chi Shek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

EXL conceptualized this study, analysed, interpreted the data and was involved in data acquisition and drafting of manuscript. LJC analysed, interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. ABZ, LDHT, IK interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. AG, TOH, HVB, PDG, FY, KHT, YSC and BWL conceptualized the study and were involved in data acquisition and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. LPS supervised the research and was involved in conceptualizing the study, data acquisition and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynette Pei-chi Shek.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was obtained from the Domain Specific Review Board of Singapore National Healthcare Group and the Centralised Institutional Review Board of SingHealth. Conduct of this study was based on the guidelines in the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Chong YS has received reimbursement for speaking at conferences sponsored by Abbott Nutrition, Nestle, and Danone. Shek LP has received reimbursement for speaking at conferences sponsored by Danone and Nestle and consulting for Mead Johnson and Nestle.

Chong YS is part of an academic consortium that has received research funding from Abbot Nutrition, Nestle and Danone. Shek LP has received research funding from Danone.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Rarefaction curves showing the number of reads per sample against observed operational taxonomic unit (OTU) or Shannon diversity indices of each dust sample. Figure S2. Principal coordinates plots of house dust samples of allergic and non-allergic subjects based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities. Figure S3. Correlation analysis of the concentrations of tropomyosin and house dust mites of dust samples from Sofa of allergic subjects and non-allergic subjects. (DOCX 1027 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loo, E.X.L., Chew, L.J.M., Zulkifli, A.B. et al. Comparison of microbiota and allergen profile in house dust from homes of allergic and non-allergic subjects- results from the GUSTO study. World Allergy Organ J 11, 37 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40413-018-0212-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40413-018-0212-5

Keywords

World Allergy Organization Journal

ISSN: 1939-4551

Contact us