Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Original research
  • Open Access

Brazilian experience with atopy patch tests for Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae and Blomia tropicalis

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 4 and
  • 1
World Allergy Organization Journal201811:27

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40413-018-0206-3

  • Received: 21 June 2018
  • Accepted: 11 September 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the positivity rates of atopy patch tests for Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae and Blomia tropicalis in patients with respiratory diseases such as asthma and allergic rhinitis with or without atopic dermatitis.

Methods

The patients’ clinical histories were collected, and the patients were subjected to skin prick and patch tests with the three different house dust mites on the same day. The patch tests were examined 48 hours later, and then patients were divided into two groups: I- patients with respiratory diseases, such as asthma and/or rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis and II-patients with only respiratory diseases. A total of 74 patients ranging in age from 2 to 60 years were included in this study; 16 patients were included in group I and 58 were included in group II. This study was approved by the human ethics committee of the Faculty of Medical Science and Health SUPREMA (number 2.007.135), and written informed consent was collected from each patient or their parents prior to enrollment.

Results

In the skin prick tests, the most prevalent mite that evoked a reaction was Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, followed by Dermatophagoides farinae and Blomia tropicalis. Regarding the atopy patch tests, the mite that most frequently induced a positive reaction was Dermatophagoides farinae (78.4%), followed by Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (77%) and Blomia tropicalis (52.7%). A comparison of the skin prick and atopy patch tests revealed that 53 patients (71.6%) were positive on both tests, and 30 (56.6%) patients were positivite for the same mite. We found six patients (8%) who had a positive clinical history of allergy and only exhibited positivity on the atopy patch test.

Discussion

Most studies have been performed with atopic dermatitis patients, but in this study, most of the patients had respiratory conditions. Blomia tropicalis is a mite that is prevalent in tropical areas, such as Brazil, and only two publications include these three mites, wich are present in Brazil. The APT may produce positive results in concordance with the SPT resuts, but may also be the only positive test ( 8%) as we observed in our study. These results suggest that the mite atopy patch test is relevant and should be considered as an additional test for patients with clinical histories of allergic respiratory disease who have negative prick test results.

Conclusion

The APT should be considered as an additional test when the SPT and specific serum IgE tests are negative in patients with clinical histories of allergies.

Keywords

  • Atopy patch test
  • Skin prick test
  • House dust mite
  • Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus
  • Dermatophagoides farinae
  • Blomia tropicalis
  • Rhinitis
  • Asthma
  • Atopic dermatitis

Background

The first use of aeroallergen extracts for skin patch testing was reported in 1937 [1]. In 1982, Mitchell et al., performed the first patch test with purified mite antigen in atopic dermatitis patients and confirmed that acute eczematous lesions can be induced by the application of inhalant allergens to the skin. This technique was defined as the atopy patch test (APT), introduced in 1989 by Ring et al., [2], because this test can be applied to subjects with atopic eczema. Many studies [37] have been performed to standardize the APT in terms of single allergen concentrations, optimal vehicles, and the time intervals required to evaluate the results, with the aim of providing a reproducible tool that can be used in routine diagnostic allergy workups. According to the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis, a standardized APT technique requires purified allergen preparations measured in biological units or in major allergen content, the use of 12-mm Finn-Chambers on Scanpor tape, the use of petrolatum as the vehicle, and reading of the results at 48 and 72 hours [8]. The APT has been determined to be relevant for foods, especially in children, but standardization is lacking and the reproducibility of this test is poor [9].

Regarding allergy testing, the skin prick test (SPT) and measurements of specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies in the serum are used to indicate sensitization in immediate type I hypersensitivity reactions, but these tests must be combined with the subject’s case history to diagnose a clinical allergy. The APT, which consists of applying the suspected allergen to the skin using the same method as patch testing for contact dermatitis, was introduced as a technique for evaluating sensitization to aeroallergens and measuring type IV sensitization in subjects with atopic dermatitis [2]. This test was later confirmed to be a valid test, particularly for dust mites [4, 5, 1618]. Notably, recent studies have found that the APT may be the only positive test in patients with atopic dermatitis and respiratory allergies [19, 20].

House dust mites are a major cause of allergic diseases worldwide [10]. The most frequently responsible mites are Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae, which produce efficient allergens that are able to induce sensitization and clinical disease [11]. The spectrum of allergic manifestations includes atopic dermatitis [12] (which is particularly frequent in children), rhinitis, asthma [13, 14] and, very rarely, anaphylaxis [15]. Mites of the genus Blomia, including Blomia tropicalis, are an important cause of IgE antibody responses among asthmatic patients in tropical and subtropical areas of the world [2123]. Exposure to Blomia tropicalis has been documented in houses in Brazil, and this allergen has been designated Blo t 5. Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae and Blomia tropicalis are currently the main causes of allergic diseases in Brazil, and our patients are tested for allergies to these mites with the SPT in our daily practice.

In the past two decades, research has demonstrated that in patients with respiratory diseases such as rhinitis and asthma, allergic symptoms may be sustained by T-cell-mediated reactions as demonstrated by positive results in the APT. Importantly, in patients with T-cell-mediated allergies, the APT can be the only positive test [16, 20, 25, 26]. These clinical data on the role of the APT are supported by evidence regarding the capacity of this test to reproduce the pathophysiological events of atopic dermatitis. Specifically, application of the APT to the skin of atopic dermatitis patients is followed by an influx of inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells [27], which enables the detection of a shift from TH2 cytokines to a TH1 pattern that can be detected 24 hours after the APT, as occurs for chronic atopic dermatitis skin lesions after 48 hours [28, 29].

We performed a study that applied methodologies that have been used in Europe in recent years, especially those of Fuiano et al., [26, 33, 35]. We replicated these previous studies to evaluate the potential use of the APT as an additional test, especially for patients with positive histories of allergic diseases with negative SPT and radioallergosorbent test (RAST) results. We used the three most common house dust mites in Brazil, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae and Blomia tropicalis.

Methods

A total of 74 patients ranging in age from 2 to 60 years were included in this study and were divided into the following 2 groups: group I - patients with atopic dermatitis and other allergic respiratory diseases, such as allergic rhinitis and/or asthma; and group II - patients with only respiratory diseases, such as rhinitis and/or asthma, without atopic dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis was diagnosed according the criteria of Hanifin and Rajka [30], and allergic rhinitis and asthma were diagnosed according to the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines [31].

The patients were subjected to SPT with extracts from International Pharmaceutical Immunology ASAAC Brasil (IPI ASAAC) and to APTs with aeroallergens from Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae, Blomia tropicalis from IPI ASAAC Brasil at concentrations of 0.085 g ± 10% on the same day. A negative control of saline solution and a positive control with histamine were used for the SPT. The reactions were considered positive in the presence of a wheal diameter of at least 3 mm larger than that observed for the negative controls.

For the APT, the substances were applied to the intact skin of the lower back and held firmly in position using a Finn Chamber (Smart Practice, 3400 E Mc Dowell Rd., Phoenix, Arizona, USA) 12 mm in diameter on a micropore tape. The application period was 48 hours, and the test was examined at least 30 minutes after removal to avoid any margin effect. Only one evaluation was performed after 48 hours, as suggested by Darsow et al., [4] in 1995. The results were interpreted according to the American Academy of Dermatology APT criteria using a scale ranging from 1+ (weak reaction) to 3+ (strong reaction) [32]. Finn Chambers with petrolatum were used in the control test. We informed the families that they should avoid using antihistamines and oral or topical corticosteroids for seven days prior to the SPT and APT.

The study was approved by the human ethics committee of the Faculty of Medical Science and Health SUPREMA (number 2.007.135), and written informed consent was obtained from each patient or their parents prior to enrollment.

Patients who had taken antihistamines, oral or topical corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs that might have altered the positivity of the tests, patients with food allergies; those with gastrointestinal symptoms, such as eosinophilic esophagitis; children under 2 years of age; and patients over 60 years were excluded from the study.

Results

We performed SPTs and APTs on 74 patients using three different house dust mites: Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae and Blomia tropicalis. Fifty-three patients were female (71.6%), and 21 were male (28.4%). Group I comprised 16 patients (patients with atopic dermatitis and other allergic respiratory diseases, such as allergic rhinitis and/or asthma), and 58 patients were included in group II (patients with only respiratory diseases, such as rhinitis and/or asthma, without atopic dermatitis) (Table 1).
Table 1

SPTs and APTs performed in 74 patients

 

Variables

Number

Percentage (%)

Sex

Male

53

71.6%

Female

21

28.4%

Group

I

16

21.6%

II

58

78.4%

Total

 

74

100%

In the SPTs, 64 patients were positive for at least one mite (86.5%) (Fig. 1). The most frequently positive mite was Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (66 patients, 89.2%), followed by Dermatophagoides farinae (55 patients, 74.3%) and Blomia tropicalis (21 patients, 28.4%) (Fig. 2). In the APT, we observed 60 positive patients (81%) and 14 negative patients (19%) (Fig. 3). Most of the positive patients were positive for more than one mite, and only 2 patients were positive for only Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. Fifty-seven patients were positive for Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (77%), 58 were positive for Dermatophagoides farinae (78.4%) and 39 were positive for Blomia tropicalis (52.7%) (Fig. 4).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Total SPT positivity

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Positive results in the SPTs for each mite including: Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (89.2%), Dermatophagoides farinae (74.3%) and Blomia tropicalis (28.4%)

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Total APT positivity for all mites tested

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

APT positivity for each mite: Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (77%), Dermatophagoides farinae (78.4%), Blomia tropicalis (52.7%)

When we compared the positivity between the SPT and APT, 53 patients (71.6%) were positive in both tests. Of those, 30 patients (56.6%) exhibited positivity to the same mite (Fig. 5). We found that 6 patients (8%) had negative SPT and positive APT results (Fig. 6). Of those, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae were positive for all 6 patients, including 5 + and one ++ positive finding. Blomia tropicalis exhibited positivity in 3 patients ranging from + to +++. No positive results were obtained for negative control tests in the SPT or APT. Moreover, the histamine control yielded all positive results in SPTs.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Points located in the upper right quadrant were positive in both tests, i.e., the prick test measurements were greater than 3 mm and the patch tests exhibited some degree of positivity for at least one of the mites

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Patients who were positive in the APT and negative in the SPT (6 patients, 8%)

Discussion

The SPT is the most frequently performed test for assessing immediate hypersensitivity (type I) for both respiratory and skin allergies. The APT evaluates allergen-induced delayed type hypersensitivity (type IV). Eczematous reactions at the site of application are examined 48–72 hours later to determine the sensitization of patients to the allergen [16].

Positive patch tests are associated with the presence of IgE bearing Langerhans cells in the epidermis of atopic dermatitis patients [36, 37]. Aeroallergens bind to Langerhans cells and activate allergen-specific T-cell responses, which are associated with IgE production and delayed type hypersensitivity. A large body of evidence indicates the role of APT in the evaluation of aeroallergens in atopic dermatitis, but its relationships to the SPT and specific IgE levels in respiratory allergies have not been fully investigated.

Several articles have demonstrated the relevance of aeroallergens in patients with atopic dermatitis as evaluated by the SPT and APT, and avoidance of these aeroallergens results in improvements in dermatitis [3840]. In one study, the sensitization rate to house dust mites was 56% according to the RAST, 24% for the SPT and 47% for the APT in patients with atopic dermatitis [41].

Guler et al., [16] tested sensitivity to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus with an APT in 63 patients with respiratory diseases, including asthma and rhinitis, and found a 25% positivity rate (30% among asthmatic children and 20% among children with allergic rhinitis). No correlation with the SPT papule diameter was found, and APT reactions were minimal (+). This finding corroborates the finding in our study, which may imply a role of delayed hypersensitivity in patients with respiratory allergies.

In recent decades, epidemiological studies of allergic disorders in children, including atopic dermatitis, rhinitis and asthma, have demonstrated continuous increases in prevalence. However, these studies have typically been performed with questionnaires and, occasionally, with SPTs or in vitro IgE tests, and the portions of these allergies sustained by a cell-mediated mechanism were neglected because an essential test, i.e., the APT, was not performed [33].

Several studies have attempted to standardize the APT for aeroallergens with a wide variety of methods [4, 5, 19, 24]. Skin abrasion [4547], tape stripping [18, 48], and sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) application [49] are frequently used to enable allergen penetration. However, studies of APTs on nonabraded, nonpretreated skin have also been performed [2, 5052] and produced different numbers of positive reactions; obviously, these differences were partially related to different allergen contents in the preparations. Patch tests have been performed with three lyophilized common aeroallergens: house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus), cat dander, and grass pollen (Allergopharma, Reinbek, Germany). At the time of removal, after 48 hours, 57 areas developed positive reactions, and 49 areas were graded +, but after 72 hours, the number of positive reactions declined to 41. Compared with the reactions to classic patch tests with contact allergens, APT reactions showed a different time course, and the peak severity of APT reactions was reached after 48 hours. After this time, the reactions showed no further increase but rather decreased, indicating differences between these reactions and responses to classic contact allergy tests. These allergens were used at concentrations of 1000 protein nitrogen units (PNU)/g and 10,000 PNU/g in two different vehicles: (1) white petrolatum/10% isopropyl myristate and (2) methylcellulose hydrogel/10% propylene glycol. No differences were observed with the vehicle used, but the higher concentration elicited more positivity than the lower concentrantion [4]. Various concentrations of allergens in APTs are described in the literature, with a range from 1× SPT (10,000 AU/ml) to 1.000× SPT [4]. Van Voorst Vader et al. concluded that the optimal allergen concentration is 500× SPT with an exposure time of 48 hours [18]. Langeveld-Wildschut et al. concluded that the concentration should be equal to 1× SPT, and according to their results, increasing the allergen concentration to 10× SPT did not significantly influence the number of positive results [42]. Authors from Poland also studied the influence of allergen concentrations and found that 0.1× SPT was too low, while 10× SPT produced significantly more reactions than 1× SPT [43]. Data in the literature indicate that positive APT reactions can occur in 15–90% of atopic eczema patients depending on the methodology used for testing [43, 44].

Liu Y et al. performed a systematic review and meta-analysis last year, comparing APT to SPT for the diagnosis of mite-induced atopic dermatitis. In the ten studies analyzed, the percentage of APT- positive subjects ranged from 14 to 70%, likely due to the lack of standardized techniques, different allergen sources and purification in both the APT and SPT tests. The majority of studies used Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, and few studies used other mite species. Different Finn chamber sizes, extracts and vehicles were used in different studies, and various methods were used to score APT results. The meta-analysis concluded that APT should be used alongside SPT for the identification of mite sensitization in patients with atopic dermatitis, but better standardization would be valuable.

The limitations of APTs include this lack of standardization. Our study was performed with APTs for aeroallergens from Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae and Blomia tropicalis from IPI ASAAC at concentrations of 0.085 g ± 10%, as described in the Fuiano et al. study. Positivity to mites in the APT among patients with respiratory symptoms was higher than other values found in other studies, and we hypothesized that Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae and Blomia tropicalis are the main sources of allergies in Brazil and produce the greatest positivity rates in SPTs, which differs from observations in the USA and Europe. It is difficult to compare these studies because each laboratory and each country have different methods of standardization.

In our study, the percentage of patients with a positive allergy history, a negative SPT and a positive patch test was 8%. Data in the literature suggest that the APT is positive in 17.5% of subjects with a positive history to only inhalant allergens. Most studies of APT positivity have been performed in atopic dermatitis patients; we obtained a different result in our study. No difference in reactivity was observed in the group with atopic dermatitis and respiratory symptoms relative to the group with respiratory symptoms alone.

Among different allergy mechanisms, the T-cell mediated mechanism has long been recognized as decisive in atopic dermatitis; thus, the APT has a significant diagnostic role, as initially demonstrated by sensitization to foods [32], and later demonstrated by sensitization to inhalant allergens, particularly house dust mites [33, 34]. The fact that the APT may be the only positive test in patients with respiratory allergies underlines the importance of the inclusion of this test in the diagnostic work-up of allergy patients. Otherwise, patients with negative results who undergo an SPT or in vitro IgE tests may be erroneously classified as nonallergic or as having local rhinitis. Thus, the APT should be considered as an additional method for diagnostic application.

Conclusions

The results suggest that the APT is relevant to clinical investigations in patients with respiratory allergic symptoms, especially when they have a clinical history and negative SPT and/or IgE results specific to mites. The APT may produce positive results in concordance with the SPT results but may also be the only positive test (8%), as we observed in our study. The APT should be considered as an additional test when the SPT and specific serum IgE tests are negative in patients with typical clinical histories of allergies.

Abbreviations

AD: 

Atopic dermatitis

APT: 

Atopy patch test

BT: 

Blomia tropicalis

DF: 

Dermatophagoides farinae

DP: 

Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus

HDM: 

House dust mite

SPT: 

Skin prick test

Declarations

Acknowledgements

I acknowledge the tremendous efforts of Fernando Aarestrup PhD, in facilitating this project, as my guide and the idealizer of this research. I would like to thank my husband and children for their support, help and patience which allowed this project to be performed.

Authors’ contributions

FMA provided the initial concept that led to the development of the research. IPCMSL selected the patients, analysed the tests,collected the datas and wrote the article. EMSL selected patients and analysed the tests. MCSL and ECSL selected patients. BJVA reviewed the article. All authors have approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the human ethics committee of the Faculty of Medical Science and Health SUPREMA (number: 2.007.135, CAAE: 66005417.5.0000.5103).

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from each patient or their parents prior to enrollment.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
(2)
Faculty of Medical Science and Health SUPREMA, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
(3)
Centro Universitário de Belo Horizonte – UniBH, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
(4)
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - Campus de Betim, Betim, Brazil

References

  1. Rosternberg A, Sulzberger MB. Some results of patch tests. Arch Dermatol. 1937;35:433–54.Google Scholar
  2. Ring J, Kunz B, Bieber T, Vieluf D. The “atopy pacth test” with aeroallergens in atopic eczema. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989;82:195.Google Scholar
  3. Seidenari S, Manzini BM, Danes P, Giannetti A. Positive patch test to whole mite culture and purified mite extracts in patients with atopic dermatitis, asthma, and rhinitis. Ann Allergy. 1992;69:201–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Darsow U, Vieluf D, Ring J. Atopy patch tests with different vehicles and allergen concentrations: an approach to standardization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995;93:677–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Darsow U, Vieluf D, Ring J. Evaluating the relevance of aeroallergen sensitization in atopic eczema with the atopy patch test: a randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40:187–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Heinemann C, Schliemann-Willers S, Kelterer D, et al. The atopy patch test: reproducibility and comparison of different evaluation methods. Allergy. 2002;57:641–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ingordo V, D'Andria G, D'Andria C, Tortora A. Results of atopy patch tests with house dust mites in adults with “intrinsic” and “extrinsic” atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2002;16:450–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Darsow U, Wollenberg A, Simon D, et al. ETFAD/EADV eczema task force 2009 position paper on diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24:317–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Jesenak M, Banovcin P, Rennerova Z, et al. Reproducibility of food atopy patch tests over time in general child population. Int J Dermatol. 2009;48:941–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Platts Mills TA, Chapman MD. Dust mites: immunology. Allergic diseases and environmental control. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1987;80:755–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Zock JP, Heinrich J, Jarvis D, et al. Distribution and determinants of house dust mite allergens in Europe: the European Community respiratory health survey II. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118:682–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Tupker RA, de Monky JG, Coenraads PJ. House dust mite hypersensitivity, eczema, and other non-pulmonary manifestations of allergy. Allergy. 1998;53:92–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaffin JM, Phipatanakul W. The role of indoor allergens in the development of asthma. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;9:126–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Peroni DG, Piacentini GL, Alfonsi L, Zerman L, Di Blasi P, Visoná G, Nottegar F, Boner AL. Rhinitis in pre-school children: prevalence, association with allergic diseases and risk factors. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003;33:1349–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Edson E, van Hage-Hamsten M. Death in anaphylaxis in a man with house dust mite allergy. Int J Legal Med. 2003;117:229–301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Guler N, Kilerleri E, Tamay Z, Ones U. Atopy patch testing in children with asthma and rhinitis symptons allergic to house dust mite. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2006;17:346–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Shah D, Hales J, Cooper D, Camp R. Recognition of pathogenically relevant house dust mite hypersensitivity in adults with atopic dermatitis : a new approach? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;109:1012–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. van Voorst Vader PC, Lier JG, Woest TE, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP(1991) Patch test with house dust mite antigens in atopic dermatitis patients: methodological methods.Acta Dermatol Venereol 71:301–305.Google Scholar
  19. Darsow U, Laifaoui J, Kerschenlohr K, et al. The prevalence of positive reactions in the atopy patch test with aeroallergens and food allergens in subjects with atopic eczema: a European multicenter study. Allergy. 2004;59:1318–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Fuiano N, Incorvaia C. Comparison of skin prick test and atopy patch test with dust mite extracts in patients with respiratory symptoms or atopic eczema dermatitis syndrome. Allergy. 2003;58:828.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Arruda LK, Chapman MD. A review of recent immunochemical studies of Blomia tropicalis and Euroglyphus maynei allergens. Exp Appl Acarol. 1992;16:129–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Fernandez-Caldas E, Puerta L, Mercado D, Lockey RF, Caraballo LR. Mite fauna, derp I, Derf l and Btomia tropicalis allergen levels in a tropical environment. Clin Exp Allergy. 1993;23:292–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Arruda LK, Rizzo MC, Chapman MD, Fernandcz-Caldas E, Baggio D, Platts-Mills TAE, Naspitz CK. Exposure and sensitization to dust mite allergens among asthmatic children in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Clin Exp Allergy. 1991;21:433–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Ring J, Darsow U, Behrendt H. Atopic eczema and allergy. Curr Allergy Rep. 2001;1:39–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Wistokat-Wulfing A, Schimdt P, Darsow U, Ring J, Kapp A, Werfel T. Atopy patch test reactions are associated with T lymphocyte-mediated allergen-specific immune responses in atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Allergy. 1999;29:513–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Fuiano N, Incorvaia C, Prodam F, Procaccini DA, Bona G. Relationship between the atopy patch test and clinical expression of the disease in children with atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome and respiratory symptoms. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;101:174–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Kerschenlohr K, Decard S, Przybilla B, Wollenberg A. Atopy pathc test reactions show a rapidly influx of inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells (IDEC) in patients with extrinsic atopic dermatitis and patients with intrinsic atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111:869–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Sager N, Feldmann A, Schilling C, Kreitsch P, Neumann C. House dust mite-specific T cells in the skin of subjects with atopic dermatitis frequency and lymphokine profile in the allergen patch test. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992;89:801–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. van Reijsen FC, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA, Kalthoff FS, Maggi E, Romagnani S, Westland JK, et al. Skin-derived aeroallergen-specific T-cell clones of the Th2 phenotype in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992;90:184–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Hanifin JM, Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1980;92:44–7.Google Scholar
  31. Bousquet J, Khaltaev N, Cruz AA, Denburg J, Fokkens WJ, Togias A, et al. Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) 2008 update (in collaboration with the World Health Organization, GA (2)LEN and AllerGen). Allergy. 2008;63(suppl 86):8–160.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Kanof NB. The American academy of dermatology patch test series for contact dermatitis. Int J Dermatol. 1977;16:827–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Fuiano N, Diddi G, Delvecchio M, Incorvaia C. Prevalence of positive atopy patch test in an unselected pediatric population. Clinical and Molecular Allergy. 2015;13:2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Lipozenic J, Wolf R. The diagnostic value of atopy patch testing and prick testing in atopic dermatitis: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2010;28(1):38–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Fuiano N, Fusilli S, Incorvaia C. House dust mite-related allergic diseases: role of the skin prick test, atopy patch test and RAST in the diagnosis of different manifestations of allergy. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169:819–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Barker JNWN, Alegre VA, Mc-Donald DM. Surface-bound immunoglobulin E on antigen-presenting cells in cutaneous tissue of atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. 1988;90:117–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Beiber T, de la Salle H, Wollenberg A, et al. Human epidermal Langerhan cells express the high affinity receptor for immunoglobulin E ( FceR1). J Exp Med. 1992;175:1285–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Clarck RA, Adino AD. The relationship between positive aeroallergen patch test reactions and aeroallergen exarcebations of atopic dermatitis. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1989;53:132–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Pajino GB, Peroni DG, Barberio G, Pietrobelli A, Boner AL. Predictive features for persistence of atopic dermatitis in children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2003;14:292–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Varela P, Selores M, Gomes E, et al. Immediate and delayed hypersensitivity to mite antigens in atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol. 1999;16:1–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Holm L, van H-HKM, Ohman S, Scheynius A. Sensitization to allergens of house dust mite in adults with atopic dermatitis in a cold temperature region. Allergy. 1999;54:708–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Langerveld-Wildschut E, van Marion AM, Thepen T, Mudde G, Brujnzeel P. Evaluation of variables influencing the outcome of the atopy patch test. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995;96:66–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Czanecka-Opracz M, Bator-Wegner M, Silny W. Atopy patch test reaction to airborne allergens. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2005;13:3–16.Google Scholar
  44. Langeland T, Braathen LB. BorchM. Studies of atopic patch test. Acta Derm Venerol Suppl. 1989;144:105–9.Google Scholar
  45. Mitchell E, Chapman M, Pope F, Crow J, Joubal S, Platts-Mills T. Basophils in allergen-induced patch test sites in atopic dermatitis. Lancet. 1982;1:127–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Norris P, Schofield O, Camp R. A study of the role of house dust mite in atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 1988;118:435–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Gondo A, Saeki N, Tokuda Y. Challenge reactions in atopic dermatitis after percutaneous entry of mite antigen. Br J Dermatol. 1986;115:485–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Bruynzeel-Koomen C, van Wichen D, Spry C, Venge P, Bruynzeel P. Active participation of eosinophils in patch test reactions to inhalant allergens in patients with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 1988;118:229–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Tanaka Y, Anan S, Yoshida H. Immunohistochemical studies in mite antigen-induced patch test sites in atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol Sci. 1990;1:361–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Vieluf D, Kunz B, Bieber T, Przybilla B, Ring J. “Atopy patch test” with aeroallergens in patients with atopic eczema. Allergo-Journal. 1993;1:9–12.Google Scholar
  51. Vocks E, Seifer H, Seifer B, Drosner M. Patch test with immediate type allergens in patients with atopic dermatitis. In: Ring J, Przybilla B, editors. New trends in allergy III. Berlin, Springer; 1991. p. 230–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Sager N, Neuman C, Marghescu S. Der Epikutantest auf Inhalationsallergene ist eine immunspezifische Spattypreaktion. Z Hautkr. 1992;67:600–4.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement