From: Current status of sublingual immunotherapy in the United States
Study | Product Studied | Number of patients in study | Age in years, mean (range) | % Poly-sensitized | Primary Efficacy Endpoint Results | Adverse Events Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nelson et al. 2010 | Timothy grass tablet | 439 | 35.9 (18–65) | 76.9% | • Compared to placebo, the treatment group had at 20% improvement in TCS. | • The most common AEs were oral pruritus, throat irritation, ear pruritus, and upper respiratory tract infections. |
• DSS improved by 18% and RQLQ by 17% in treatment group versus placebo. DMS improved by 26%. | • There were no serious AEs or anaphylactic reactions. | |||||
• There was 1 patient in the treatment group that received epinephrine from possible systemic reaction. | ||||||
Blaiss et al. 2010 | Timothy grass tablet | 345 | 12.3 (5–17) | 89% | • TCS improved 26% in treatment group versus placebo. | • Common AEs included oral pruritus, throat irritation, and mouth irritation. |
• DSS improved 25%, DMS improved 81%, and RQLQ improved 18% over placebo. | • A moderate reaction of lip edema, dysphagia, and cough was reported by one patient, which responded to epinephrine. It was not considered systemic by the investigator. | |||||
Maloney et al. 2014 | Timothy grass tablet MK-7243 | 1501 | 33 (5–65) | 85% | • MK-7243 provided a 20% lower DSS during peak and entire GPS, 38% lower DMS during peak season, 35% lower DMS during entire GPS, and 32% lower TCS during entire GPS compared to placebo. | • The most common AEs were throat irritation, oral pruritus or paresthesias, mouth edema, and ear pruritus. |
• Systemic reactions occurred in 2 MK-7243 patients, were moderate in severity, and resolved without treatment. | ||||||
• There were no severe systemic reactions and no deaths. | ||||||
Cox et al. 2012 | 5-grass tablet 300IR | 473 | 37.2 (18–65) | 77.9% | • Those in the treatment group had a significantly lower CS during the peak pollen season than the placebo group, with a relative decrease in 28.2%. | • Common AEs included oral itching, throat irritation, and nasopharyngitis. |
• The benefit was most notable in those with baseline detectable serum IgE to timothy grass. | • There were no anaphylactic reactions and no serious treatment-related adverse events. | |||||
Nolte et al. 2013 | Ragweed tablet | 565 | 35.4 (18–50) | 85% | • During the peak ragweed season, the 6- Amb a 1 unit group and 12-Amb a 1 unit group had a 21% and 27% reduction in TCS compared to placebo, respectively. | • The most common AEs were oral pruritus, throat irritation, swollen tongue, and ear pruritus. |
• During the entire ragweed season, the 6- Amb a 1 unit group and 12-Amb a 1 unit group had a 16% and 26% reduction in TCS compared to placebo, respectively. | • There were no serious treatment-related AEs. | |||||
• One treatment patient received epinephrine for sensation of pharyngeal edema. | ||||||
Creticos et al. 2013 | Ragweed liquid | 429 | 38.3 (18–55) | 83.9% | • The treatment group had a 43% reduction in TCS during the entire ragweed season compared to placebo. | • The most frequently reported treatment-related AEs were oromucosal reactions, which occurred early and were transient. |
 |  |  |  |  | • This was statistically significant after adjusting the 95% confidence interval to account for 20% clinically meaningful difference over placebo. | • There were no systemic reactions, anaphylaxis, or death in the treatment group. |