From: A WAO - ARIA - GA²LEN consensus document on molecular-based allergy diagnostics
Advantages | Disadvantages | |
---|---|---|
ISAC | • 30 μl of serum or plasma (capillary or venous blood) | • Manual method |
• 112 allergens can be assayed in parallel | • Semi-quantitative assay | |
• Natural and recombinants proteins | • Less sensitive | |
• Less allergen needed (approximately 100, 000-fold, pg vs. μg) per assay | • More variability in the inter-assay analysis for certain allergens | |
• No interference from very high total IgE | • Greater coefficient of variation | |
• Some allergen sources are not included | ||
• Less appropriate for monitoring sensitization | ||
• Potential interference between IgE and other isotypes, principally IgG | ||
ImmunoCAP | • Automatic method | • 40 μl of serum per allergen |
• Quantitative assay | • One allergen per assay | |
• High sensitivity | • Detect low-affinity antibody that may have little to no clinical relevance | |
• Lower coefficient of variation | ||
• Natural or recombinants proteins or crude extracts | ||
• Appropriate for monitoring sensitization | ||
Skin prick test | • High sensitivity (extract-dependent) | • Manual |
• Immediate reading | • One allergen per prick | |
• Only crude extracts | ||
• Not appropriate for monitoring sensitization |