Open Access

Food Allergy--Lessons from Asia

  • Bee Wah Lee1, 2Email author,
  • Lynette Pei-Chi Shek1, 2,
  • Irvin Francis A. Gerez2,
  • Shu E Soh1 and
  • Hugo P. Van Bever1, 2
World Allergy Organization Journal20081:129

https://doi.org/10.1097/WOX.0b013e31817b7431

Received: 7 November 2007

Accepted: 10 April 2008

Published: 15 July 2008

Abstract

Objective

This is a review on published data available on food allergy in East Asia and a discussion on the insights that it offers.

Methods

PubMed searches were made for terms food allergy and anaphylaxis, in combination with Asia.

Results

There is a paucity of population-based prevalence studies on food allergy in Asia. Certain unique food allergens, such as buckwheat, chestnuts, chickpeas, bird's nest, and royal jelly, which are consumed extensively by certain Asian populations have resulted in clinical food allergy of little importance in other populations. Crustacean shellfish is of importance in this region relative to other common food allergens. The high consumption of these foods and possibly coupled with cross-reactive tropomyosins from dominant inhalant dust mite and cockroach allergens in this region may explain this phenomenon. In contrast, the prevalence of peanut allergy is relatively low in this region. The reasons for this difference are not apparent. However, this may be a reflection of the general reduced propensity in this region to allergic diseases as seen with asthma.

Conclusions

Further research on food allergy in Asia is warranted because it offers unique opportunities to further our understanding on the influence of population and environment.

Keywords

food allergy Asia shellfish allergy peanut allergy buckwheat bird's nest chickpeas royal jelly

The allergy epidemic has resulted in a global rise in prevalence of allergic diseases such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, and eczema in the recent decades. This increase is highest in affluent communities adopting a westernized lifestyle, with the western populations documenting the highest prevalence [1]. Similar trends have been observed for food allergy, particularly peanut allergy,[2] but these are less well documented globally. The reason, at least in part, may be related to the inherent difficulties ascertaining a population's prevalence of true food allergy. Self-reported food allergy notoriously overestimates the true prevalence, probably because of subjective bias. Nonetheless, such observations between populations are useful starting points for understanding differences in the patterns of food allergy and possibly their underlying mechanisms. The objective of this article is to review the data available on food allergy (immunoglobulin E [IgE] mediated) in East Asia and discuss the insights that it might offer.

Methods

PubMed searches were made for food allergy and Asia. In addition, a search was also made for food allergy and the respective East Asian countries, China, Japan, Korea, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam. Similarly, these regions were searched in combination with the term anaphylaxis.

Population Studies

There are few population-based studies on food allergy in Asia. The epidemiology of food allergy in Asia has been reviewed recently [3]. Population prevalence studies based on self-reported questionnaires targeted at children younger than 12 years ranged from 4% in Singapore[4] and rural China[5] to as high as 12% in Seoul, Korea,[6] and Japan [7]. This wide range in prevalence mirrors those reported in a recent meta-analysis obtained from surveys on populations elsewhere (3%Y35%),[8] and it was concluded that these differences were related to survey methodologies rather than a true difference. The authors recommended that standardized methods, including specific IgE measurements with standardized allergen extracts, and if possible challenge testing, are necessary to obtain more accurate estimates of prevalence. It therefore seems that comparing the true prevalence of food allergies across populations will still require considerable research effort.

Food Allergens Unique to Asia

It has been observed that certain specific foods consumed mainly in the Asian region have resulted in allergies that are unique to their respective populations. Allergy to edible bird's nest from swiftlets has been described in the Chinese population in Singapore,[9, 10] Malaysia,[11] and Hong Kong (G. W. K. Wong, MD, oral communication, 2006). It is the most common cause of anaphylaxis in Singapore children [12]. This food is a popular Chinese delicacy believed to have health benefits. A salivary protein with homology to the ovomucoid inhibitor has been identified as the major allergen [13, 14]. Similarly, royal jelly, another food supplement very popular among the Chinese, has also been reported to trigger asthma and anaphylaxis in Hong Kong[15] and ethnic Chinese in Australia [16].

Buckwheat causing anaphylaxis has been observed in Japan, Korea, and China [1719]. In a national survey in Japan, it has been ranked fourth as a cause of immediate hypersensitivity [20]. Buckwheat is consumed in large quantities by these populations early large exposure rather than conventional strict avoidance in the form of noodles or soba. Similarly, chickpeas, a staple food in children living in India,[21, 22] and chestnuts in Korea[23] have been described as common triggers of immediate hypersensitivity in these populations. These patterns of food allergies in populations of East Asia are not commonly recognized elsewhere. With increasing globalization, it would be necessary for practicing allergists to be familiar with these potential food allergens. It is more likely that exposure rather than genetic factors are responsible for these observations. These studies suggest that unless there is widespread exposure to potential allergenic foods in a population, clinical allergy to such foods may not be apparent.

Fish Allergens

The fish from tropical waters consumed in Asia are quite different from temperate fish. Consumption practices are also quite different. Fish is a weaning food among many populations in Asia. This contrasts with the western diet, where fish is regarded as a highly allergenic food. Fish allergy affects up to 3% of children in Scandinavian populations,[24] and until very recently, the American Academy of Pediatrics had recommended that fish be avoided until the age of 3 years [25]. There is an impression that fish allergy in this part of the world is less common than the western world, but this has not been substantiated by a systematic study. Of the temperate fish, the major allergen of cod, Gad c 1, belonging to the protein family of parvalbumins, has been the most extensively studied [26]. Evaluation of other temperate fish has shown that parvalbumin constitutes the major cross-reactive fish allergen of these fish [27, 28]. The evaluation of 4 species of tropical fish (threadfin, pomfret, Indian anchovy, and tengiri) commonly consumed in Singapore and often used as weaning foods in infants has also shown that parvalbumin is the major allergen of these tropical fish. These parvalbumins are cross-reactive with Gad c 1,[29] which was also clinically evident because most fish-allergic children in this study had clinical reactions to more than 1 fish. Only one of the 10 children evaluated was monosensitized and could tolerate consuming other fish without a clinical reaction. Hence, the allergenicity of tropical fish is comparable with cod. The reason(s) that fish allergy is not highly prevalent in tropical Asia despite high consumption and exposure in early life is not obvious, although it is tempting to postulate that paradoxically, has induced immune tolerance.

Peanut Allergy

Peanut allergy is recognized as an important food allergy because it is known to cause severe life-threatening reactions, is long-lasting, and is increasingly common in some populations. To date, there have been no published reports on population-based prevalence studies on peanut allergy in Asia, but the impression among clinicians practicing in Asia is that it is uncommon. In Singapore, a peanut allergy survey was conducted on 14-to 15-year-old schoolchildren in 2005, and results were presented at the World Allergy Congress 2007 [30]. These data and those from published studies in the western populations are shown in Table 1. The prevalence of peanut allergy in children in several western populations, such as the United States,[31] United Kingdom,[3234] Canada,[35] and France[36] are near or slightly higher than 1%. In fact, increasing trends in the US and United Kingdom populations have been documented, and it has been suggested that these populations are experiencing a peanut allergy epidemic [2]. In contrast, the Singapore study that was based on the same questionnaire developed by Sicherer et al[31] for convincing food allergies (with immediate symptoms within 2 hours and typical acute allergic symptoms), the prevalence of peanut allergy was 0.3%, or about a third of those reported in these western populations [30]. The prevalence would be even lower if skin prick tests (SPTs) of a subcohort in the Singapore study are taken into account because only one of the 22 subjects (about 4% with convincing allergies) had a positive SPT. The true prevalence of peanut allergy in Singapore children is therefore likely to be much lower than the 0.3% estimate from the questionnaire study alone.
Table 1

Prevalence of Peanut Allergy in Various Population-Based Surveys

Country

Prevalence%, 95% Confidence Interval

No. Surveyed, Response Rate

Age of Population, yrs

Study Year

Reference

United States

0.4*

2998

< 18

1997

Sicherer et al[59]

 

0.8*

2948

< 18

2002

Sicherer et al[31]

United Kingdom

1.2**

1218/1456

4

1993-1994

Tariq et al[32]

 

1.5**

1273/2878

3-4

1997-1999

Grundy et al[33]

 

1.8** (1.1-2.7)

957

4-5

2003-2005

Hourihane et al[34]

Canada

1.5** (1.2-1.9)

4339/7768

7

2000-2005

Kagan et al[35]

France

1

33,110/44,000

< 0-60

1997

Kanny 2001[36]

Singapore

0.3, 0.014**

6765/8072

14-15

2005-2006

Gerez et al[30]

*Based on nationwide telephone survey with standardized questionnaire.

**Taking into account SPTs, for Singapore study only done in a subcohort.

The notion that peanut allergy is not as prevalent in Asia is also substantiated by hospital-based studies on anaphylaxis. Studies from Singapore in children[12] and adults[10] have shown that severe peanut allergy resulting in anaphylaxis was very uncommon, with no documented cases in children and only 2 adult patients (2.7%). These data are corroborated by a study on anaphylaxis from Thailand (adults and children), where no cases of peanut allergy were recorded [37]. Similarly, a study from Hong Kong reported crustacean shellfish as the most common food trigger in 89% of cases, but there was no mention of peanut allergy [38]. The data from Asia contrast markedly with those from the United States,[39] United Kingdom,[40] and Australia,[41] where hospitalization and fatalities caused by peanut allergy are well documented.

This apparent low prevalence rate of peanut allergy in Asian populations is not likely caused by lack of exposure. Sensitization to peanuts is not uncommon among the atopic population here. In a hospital-based study of children older than 3 years attending a hospital-based allergy clinic in Singapore, sensitization to peanuts rates 27.3% and is ranked third most common after egg and shellfish,[42] and in a separate study, the rate was 12% in those younger than 3 years [43]. Relatively high rates of sensitization have also been recorded among allergic Hong Kong (31% in atopic eczema)[44] and Taiwanese children (36% in atopic eczema) [45].

The data presented here strongly support the notion that the low prevalence of peanut allergy in Asian populations compared with that in North America and the United Kingdom is true and not just conjecture. In view of the relatively high peanut sensitization among the atopic subjects in these populations, this low prevalence of allergy in Asia is more likely caused by immune tolerance rather than the lack of exposure. Resolving the reasons for this difference between populations would provide important insights into possible public health measures that could prevent further escalation of the peanut allergy epidemic of the West. Speculation on environmental and genetic differences has been discussed in detail in a recent review by Sicherer and Sampson [2]. The reason regarding the method of cooking and the allergenicity of roasted peanuts compared with boiled peanuts[46] is an often mentioned reason, although roasted peanut such as peanut butter is also widely available in Asia. Environmental rather than genetic factors are likely to play an important role in these differences in the prevalence of peanut allergy between geographic regions because the data from the United States suggest that peanut allergy prevalences of all ethnicities are similar [31].

Crustacean Shellfish Allergy

In contrast to the low prevalence of peanut allergy in Asia, crustacean shellfish seems to be an important cause of food allergy. In terms of severity, hospital-based studies on anaphylaxis show that crustacean shellfish are one of the most important food triggers in adults and children in Singapore[10, 12] and Thailand,[37] and adults in Hong Kong [38]. Interestingly, this phenomenon seems to be reversed in western populations, with less severe crustacean shellfish allergy in comparison with peanut allergy. Only a few or no cases of crustacean shellfish-induced anaphylaxis were reported in hospital-based surveys in children in the United Kingdom,[47] Italy,[48] and children and adults in Australia [49]. Instead, peanut-triggered anaphylaxis predominates in these populations. In addition, registries recording fatalities caused by anaphylaxis in the United Kingdom[40] and United States[39] also show that although peanuts and tree nut are important triggers, there was only 1 case triggered by crustacean seafood in the United Kingdom registry. It therefore seems that there is a reversal of importance between these food allergens-- the importance of peanut in the West and crustacean shellfish in Asia.

Based on population surveys, the prevalence of crustacean shellfish allergy in the United States for all ages is 2%, and 0.1% for the 0-to 5-year and 0.8% for the 6-to 17-year age group [50]. Slightly lower prevalence rates were found in Denmark. This study involved a birth cohort and their family members, which showed the absence of shellfish allergy in children (up to 21 years) and a prevalence of 0.3% in adults [51]. Like peanut allergy, there have been no published studies on population surveys in any Asian population. However, a survey conducted in Singapore schoolchildren aged 14 to 15 years presented as an abstract showed that the positive responses for convincing shellfish allergy are comparatively high (3.95% or about 5 times that of US children),[52] although most had mild symptoms (L.P-C.S., unpublished data, 2007).

Like fish, crustacean shellfish is a major component of the East Asian diet. However, unlike fish allergy, this increased exposure may explain the high prevalence of shellfish allergy in this region. Sensitization to shrimp has been observed in our atopic population from an early age. The sensitization rate was reported to be 3.6% in atopic children younger than 1 year, and 10.6% in those between 1 and 3 years [43]. Because exposure to fish and peanuts has not resulted in a high prevalence of allergy to these food allergens in Asia, it is tempting to speculate an alternative hypothesis for the high prevalence of shellfish allergy. The high prevalence of inhalant dust mite and cockroach allergies in tropical and subtropical Asia may contribute to cross-reacting allergens through the panallergen tropomyosin [53]. This protein is a major allergen in shrimp and shellfish allergy. If confirmed, this would be akin to the pollen-food syndrome observed in the temperate climates,[54] and the cross-reacting tropomyosin allergens may be responsible for the mild form of shellfish allergy, very much like the described oral allergy syndrome. This hypothesis is supported by the corelation of sensitization to shrimp and cockroach allergens in Singapore children,[42] as well as population studies on unexposed Jews who observed Kosher dietary rules, which showed that sensitization to shrimps was related to cross reacting tropomyosin allergens in house-dust mites [55]. Furthermore, in a study of 17 house dust mite allergic (HDM) patients receiving immunotherapy, 3 developed IgE against shrimp, and 2 of these having IgE against tropomyosin had oral allergy symptoms after ingesting shrimp [56].

Concluding Remarks

The data on food allergy in Asia have provided insight into the relative importance of certain food allergens in this region. Foods such as buckwheat, chestnut, chickpea, bird's nest, and royal jelly, which are consumed extensively within certain Asian populations, have resulted in clinical food allergy that is of little or no importance in other populations. Crustacean shellfish also seems to be of importance relative to other common food allergens. Whether high consumption of shellfish coupled with cross-reactive tropomyosins from inhalant dust mite and cockroach allergens (inhalant food/oral allergy syndrome) is responsible for these observations deserves further evaluation. In contrast, peanut allergy and anaphylaxis triggered by peanuts is relatively low in this region. This may reflect the relatively generally reduced propensity to allergic diseases in these populations, as is seen with asthma [57]. However, unlike the rising trends in asthma in the urbanized Asian communities, similar increases in peanut allergy are not yet apparent. Although the reasons for this are not obvious, the possibility that the threshold of developing inhalant allergies is lower than that for food allergies may be a consideration, as there is efficient induction of immune tolerance via the gastrointestinal tract [58].

End note

Supported by the National Medical Research Council Singapore (grant R-178000-131-112).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore
(2)
Children's Medical Institute, National University Hospital

References

  1. Worldwide variation in prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and atopic eczema: ISAAC. The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Steering Committee. Lancet. 1998, 351: 1225-1232. 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)07302-9.Google Scholar
  2. Sicherer SH, Sampson HA: Peanut allergy: emerging concepts and approaches for an apparent epidemic. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007, 120: 491-503. 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.07.015. [quiz 504-495]View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Shek LP, Lee BW: Food allergy in Asia. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006, 6: 197-201. 10.1097/01.all.0000225160.52650.17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee BW, Chew FT, Goh DYT: Changing prevalence of childhood allergic diseases in Singapore. Paper presented at: the 5th West-Pacific Allergy Symposium & 7th Korea-Japan Joint Allergy Symposium, Seoul, Korea; 11-14 June, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. Wang Z: An allergy prevalence survey in population of 10,144 people. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 1990, 11: 100-102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee SI, Shin MH, Lee HB, Lee JS, Son BK, Koh YY, et al: Prevalences of symptoms of asthma and other allergic diseases in Korean children: a nationwide questionnaire survey. J Korean Med Sci. 2001, 16: 155-164.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Iikura Y, Imai Y, Imai T, Akasawa A, Fujita K, Hoshiyama K, et al: Frequency of immediate-type food allergy in children in Japan. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1999, 118: 251-252. 10.1159/000024089.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Rona RJ, Keil T, Summers C, Gislason D, Zuidmeer L, Sodergren E, et al: The prevalence of food allergy: a meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007, 120: 638-646. 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.05.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Goh DL, Chew FT, Chua KY, Chay OM, Lee BW: Edible "bird's nest"-induced anaphylaxis: an under-recognized entity?. J Pediatr. 2000, 137: 277-279. 10.1067/mpd.2000.107108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Thong BY, Cheng YK, Leong KP, Tang CY, Chng HH: Immediate food hypersensitivity among adults attending a clinical immunology/allergy centre in Singapore. Singapore Med J. 2007, 48: 236-240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. de Bruyne J, Lee B: Anaphylaxis in the Asia Pacific. Allergy Clin Immunol Int: J World Allergy Org. 2004, 16: 137-141. 10.1027/0838-1925.16.4.137.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Goh DL, Lau YN, Chew FT, Shek LP, Lee BW: Pattern of food-induced anaphylaxis in children of an Asian community. Allergy. 1999, 54: 84-86. 10.1034/j.1398-9995.1999.00925.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Goh DL, Chua KY, Chew FT, Liang RC, Seow TK, Ou KL, et al: Immunochemical characterization of edible bird's nest allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001, 107: 1082-1087. 10.1067/mai.2001.114342.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ou K, Seow TK, Liang RC, Lee BW, Goh DL, Chua KY, Chung MC: Identification of a serine protease inhibitor homologue in bird's nest by an integrated proteomics approach. Electrophoresis. 2001, 22: 3589-3595. 10.1002/1522-2683(200109)22:16<3589::AID-ELPS3589>3.0.CO;2-J.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Leung R, Lam CW, Ho A, Chan JK, Choy D, Lai CK: Allergic sensitisation to common environmental allergens in adult asthmatics in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 1997, 3: 211-217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Leung R, Ho A, Chan J, Choy D, Lai CK: Royal jelly consumption and hypersensitivity in the community. Clin Exp Allergy. 1997, 27: 333-336. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1997.tb00712.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wieslander G, Norback D, Wang Z, Zhang Z, Mi Y, Lin R: Buckwheat allergy and reports on asthma and atopic disorders in Taiyuan City, Northern China. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2000, 18: 147-152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee SY, Lee KS, Hong CH, Lee KY: Three cases of childhood nocturnal asthma due to buckwheat allergy. Allergy. 2001, 56: 763-766. 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.056008763.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sohn MH, Lee SY, Kim KE: Prediction of buckwheat allergy using specific IgE concentrations in children. Allergy. 2003, 58: 1308-1310. 10.1046/j.1398-9995.2003.00339.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Imai T, Iikura Y: The national survey of immediate type of food allergy. Arerugi. 2003, 52: 1006-1013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Niphadkar PV, Patil SP, Bapat MM: Chickpea-induced anaphylaxis. Allergy. 1997, 52: 115-116. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb02559.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Patil SP, Niphadkar PV, Bapat MM: Chickpea: a major food allergen in the Indian subcontinent and its clinical and immunochemical correlation. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001, 87: 140-145. 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62209-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee SK, Yoon SH, Kim SH, Choi JH, Park HS: Chestnut as a food allergen: identification of major allergens. J Korean Med Sci. 2005, 20: 573-578. 10.3346/jkms.2005.20.4.573.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Kajosaari M: Food allergy in Finnish children aged 1 to 6 years. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1982, 71: 815-819. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1982.tb09525.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Greer FR, Sicherer SH, Burks AW: Effects of early nutritional interventions on the development of atopic disease in infants and children: the role of maternal dietary restriction, breastfeeding, timing of introduction of complementary foods, and hydrolyzed formulas. Pediatrics. 2008, 121: 183-191. 10.1542/peds.2007-3022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Elsayed S, Bennich H: The primary structure of allergen M from cod. Scand J Immunol. 1975, 4: 203-208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Poulsen LK, Hansen TK, Norgaard A, Vestergaard H, Stahl Skov P, Bindslev-Jensen C: Allergens from fish and egg. Allergy. 2001, 56 (suppl 67): 39-42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hansen TK, Bindslev-Jensen C, Skov PS, Poulsen LK: Codfish allergy in adults: IgE cross-reactivity among fish species. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997, 78: 187-194. 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63386-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lim D, Neo K, YI F, Chua KY, Goh DL, Shek LP, et al: Parvalbumin--the major tropical fish allergen. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2007, Google Scholar
  30. Gerez I, Soh J, Soh S, Morales E, Ng PZ, et al: Prevalence of peanut and tree-nut allergy in Singapore teenagers--estimates from a questionnaire survey, allergy testing and food challenges. Paper presented at: World Allergy Congress; 2007; Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
  31. Sicherer SH, Munoz-Furlong A, Sampson HA: Prevalence of peanut and tree nut allergy in the United States determined by means of a random digit dial telephone survey: a 5-year follow-up study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003, 112: 1203-1207. 10.1016/S0091-6749(03)02026-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tariq SM, Stevens M, Matthews S, Ridout S, Twiselton R, Hide DW: Cohort study of peanut and tree nut sensitisation by age of 4 years. BMJ. 1996, 313: 514-517. 10.1136/bmj.313.7056.514.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Grundy J, Matthews S, Bateman B, Dean T, Arshad SH: Rising prevalence of allergy to peanut in children: data from 2 sequential cohorts. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002, 110: 784-789. 10.1067/mai.2002.128802.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hourihane JO, Aiken R, Briggs R, Gudgeon LA, Grimshaw KE, DunnGalvin A, Roberts SR: The impact of government advice to pregnant mothers regarding peanut avoidance on the prevalence of peanut allergy in United Kingdom children at school entry. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007, 119: 1197-1202. 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.12.670.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kagan RS, Joseph L, Dufresne C, Gray-Donald K, Turnball E, Pierre YS, Clarke AE: Prevalence of peanut allergy in primary-school children in Montreal, Canada. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003, 112: 1223-1228. 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.09.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kanny G, Moneret-Vautrin DA, Flabbee J, Beaudouin E, Morisset M, Thevenin F: Population study of food allergy in France. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001, 108: 133-140. 10.1067/mai.2001.116427.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Jirapongsananuruk O, Bunsawansong W, Piyaphanee N, Visitsunthorn N, Thongngarm T, Vichyanond P: Features of patients with anaphylaxis admitted to a university hospital. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2007, 98: 157-162. 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60689-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Smit DV, Cameron PA, Rainer TH: Anaphylaxis presentations to an emergency department in Hong Kong: incidence and predictors of biphasic reactions. J Emerg Med. 2005, 28: 381-388. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.11.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Bock SA, Munoz-Furlong A, Sampson HA: Fatalities due to anaphylactic reactions to foods. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001, 107: 191-193. 10.1067/mai.2001.112031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pumphrey RS, Gowland MH: Further fatal allergic reactions to food in the United Kingdom, 1999-2006. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007, 119: 1018-1019. 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.01.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Hill DJ, Hosking CS, Heine RG: Clinical spectrum of food allergy in children in Australia and South-East Asia: identification and targets for treatment. Ann Med. 1999, 31: 272-281. 10.3109/07853899908995890.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Chiang WC, Kidon MI, Liew WK, Goh A, Tang JP, Chay OM: The changing face of food hypersensitivity in an Asian community. Clin Exp Allergy. 2007, 37: 1055-1061. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02752.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Khoo J, Shek L, Khor ES, Wang DY, Lee BW: Pattern of sensitization to common environmental allergens amongst atopic Singapore children in the first 3 years of life. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2001, 19: 225-229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hon KL, Leung TF, Lam MC, Wong KY, Chow CM, Ko WS, et al: Eczema exacerbation and food atopy beyond infancy: how should we advise Chinese parents about dietary history, eczema severity, and skin prick testing?. Adv Ther. 2007, 24: 223-230. 10.1007/BF02849889.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lo YC, Yang YH, Chiang BL: Food-specific immunoglobulin E among children with atopic dermatitis: a retrospective study. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2005, 38: 338-342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Beyer K, Morrow E, Li XM, Bardina L, Bannon GA, Burks AW, Sampson HA: Effects of cooking methods on peanut allergenicity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001, 107: 1077-1081. 10.1067/mai.2001.115480.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Colver AF, Nevantaus H, Macdougall CF, Cant AJ: Severe food-allergic reactions in children across the UK and Ireland, 1998-2000. Acta Paediatr. 2005, 94: 689-695. 10.1080/08035250510031566.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Novembre E, Cianferoni A, Bernardini R, Mugnaini A, Caffarelli C, Cavagni G, et al: Anaphylaxis in children: clinical and allergologic features. Pediatrics. 1998, 101: E8-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Braganza SC, Acworth JP, McKinnon DR, Peake JE, Brown AF: Paediatric emergency department anaphylaxis: different patterns from adults. Arch Dis Child. 2006, 91: 159-163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Sicherer SH, Munoz-Furlong A, Sampson HA: Prevalence of seafood allergy in the United States determined by a random telephone survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004, 114: 159-165. 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.04.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Osterballe M, Hansen TK, Mortz CG, Host A, Bindslev-Jensen C: The prevalence of food hypersensitivity in an unselected population of children and adults. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2005, 16: 567-573. 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2005.00251.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Shek L, Soh JY, Ng PZ, Morales EA, Ma S, Lee BW: Prevalence of peanut and shellfish allergy in Singapore children estimated from a questionnaire survey [Abstract]. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007, 119: S118-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Crespo JF, Rodriguez J: Food allergy in adulthood. Allergy. 2003, 58: 98-113. 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.02170.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Egger M, Mutschlechner S, Wopfner N, Gadermaier G, Briza P, Ferreira F: Pollen-food syndromes associated with weed pollinosis: an update from the molecular point of view. Allergy. 2006, 61: 461-476. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.00994.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Fernandes J, Reshef A, Patton L, Ayuso R, Reese G, Lehrer SB: Immunoglobulin E antibody reactivity to the major shrimp allergen, tropomyosin, in unexposed Orthodox Jews. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003, 33: 956-961. 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01722.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. van Ree R, Antonicelli L, Akkerdaas JH, Garritani MS, Aalberse RC, Bonifazi F: Possible induction of food allergy during mite immunotherapy. Allergy. 1996, 51: 108-113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Asher MI, Montefort S, Bjorksten B, et al: Worldwide time trends in the prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema in childhood: ISAAC Phases One and Three repeat multicountry cross-sectional surveys. Lancet. 2006, 368: 733-743. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69283-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Husby S, Mestecky J, Moldoveanu Z, Holland S, Elson CO: Oral tolerance in humans. T cell but not B cell tolerance after antigen feeding. J Immunol. 1994, 152: 4663-4670.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Sicherer SH, Munoz-Furlong A, Burks AW, Sampson HA: Prevalence of peanut and tree nut allergy in the US determined by a random digit dial telephone survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999, 103: 559-562. 10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70224-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© World Allergy Organization; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.